Show simple item record Perry, Robert D. Press, Madeline M. Rohatinsky, Noelle Compton, Roslyn M. Sedgwick, Monique G. 2019-08-25T20:02:26Z 2019-08-25T20:02:26Z 2016
dc.identifier.citation Perry, R. D., Press, M. M., Rohatinsky, N., Compton, R. M., & Sedgwick, M. (2016). Pilot study: Nursing students' perceptions of the environment in two different clinical models. International Journal of Nursing Science, 3, 285-290. en_US
dc.description Sherpa Romeo green journal. Open access article. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) applies. en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose: This pilot study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of a modified Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (m-DREEM) tool used to evaluate the effects of different pedagogical approaches in a clinical learning environment on nursing students' learning perceptions. Methods: A sample consisting of 130 nursing students in two different models of clinical education was surveyed. Results: This pilot study demonstrated that m-DREEM yields a high internal consistency. This tool can be used to evaluate nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment on the basis of five sub-scales: students' learning perceptions, facilitators, academic self-perception, atmosphere, social self-perception, and mentorship. Conclusion: A definitive and inferential relationship between sub-scales and clinical models, namely, block and non-block dispersed models, could not be determined because of the small sample size of the block clinical model. Hence, further research should be performed. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject Clinical environments en_US
dc.subject Nursing eduation en_US
dc.subject Student nurse en_US
dc.subject Perceptions of learning en_US
dc.subject Quantitative en_US
dc.subject m-DREEM en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Nursing students
dc.subject.lcsh Nursing--Study and teaching
dc.title Pilot study: nursing students' perceptions of the environment in two different clinical models en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.publisher.faculty Health Sciences en_US
dc.description.peer-review Yes en_US
dc.publisher.institution University of Saskatchewan en_US
dc.publisher.institution Saskatchewan Polytechnic en_US
dc.publisher.institution University of Lethbridge en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record