Pro se litigants vs lawyers: a relational perspective on the adversary system

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2019
Authors
Lokstadt, Nicole
University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of Philosophy
Abstract
This thesis gives an account of how the adversary system harms pro se litigants. I first introduce the issue of pro se litigation, explaining that being a pro se litigant is not a choice but an inescapable harm. I then look to the ideals of justice, specifically the Rule of Law, to explain how the system fails to fulfill these ideals, and consequently fails to protect the dignity of a pro se litigant. I then examine the adversary system itself, explaining how the roles of the judge and lawyers lead to a failure in the system. Finally, I look at why the adversary system is thought to be important, as well as how, when coupled with the free market, it prevents a pro se litigant’s access to justice. Ultimately, I argue the adversary system is not justified and needs to be changed or replaced with something less dignity-threatening.
Description
Keywords
Adversary system (Law) , Dignity , Justice , Pro se representation , Right to counsel , Rule of law
Citation