The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa

dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorKaseje, Dan
dc.contributor.authorKahwa, Eulalia
dc.contributor.authorKlopper, Hester C.
dc.contributor.authorMill, Judy E.
dc.contributor.authorWebber, June
dc.contributor.authorRoelofs, Susan
dc.contributor.authorHarrowing, Jean N.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-10T21:45:57Z
dc.date.available2019-06-10T21:45:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionSherpa Romeo green journal. Open access article. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international License (CC BY 4.0) appliesen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The enormous impact of HIV on communities and health services in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean has especially affected nurses, who comprise the largest proportion of the health workforce in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). Strengthening action-based leadership for and by nurses is a means to improve the uptake of evidence-informed practices for HIV care. Methods: A prospective quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa examined the impact of establishing multi-stakeholder leadership hubs on evidence-informed HIV care practices. Hub members were engaged through a participatory action research (PAR) approach. Three intervention districts were purposefully selected in each country, and three control districts were chosen in Jamaica, Kenya and Uganda. WHO level 3, 4 and 5 health care institutions and their employed nurses were randomly sampled. Self-administered, validated instruments measured clinical practices (reports of self and peers), quality assurance, work place policies and stigma at baseline and follow-up. Standardised average scores ranging from 0 to 1 were computed for clinical practices, quality assurance and work place policies. Stigma scores were summarised as 0 (no reports) versus 1 (one or more reports). Pre-post differences in outcomes between intervention and control groups were compared using the Mantel Haenszel chi-square for dichotomised stigma scores, and independent t tests for other measures. For South Africa, which had no control group, pre-post differences were compared using a Pearson chi-square and independent t test. Multivariate analysis was completed for Jamaica and Kenya. Hub members in all countries self-assessed changes in their capacity at follow-up; these were examined using a paired t test. Results: Response rates among health care institutions were 90.2 and 80.4 % at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Results were mixed. There were small but statistically significant pre-post, intervention versus control district improvements in workplace policies and quality assurance in Jamaica, but these were primarily due to a decline in scores in the control group. There were modest improvements in clinical practices, workplace policies and quality assurance in South Africa (pre-post) (clinical practices of self—pre 0.67 (95 % CI, 0.62, 0.72) versus post 0.78 (95 % CI, 0.73–0.82), p = 0.002; workplace policies—pre 0.82 (95 % CI, 0.70, 0.85) versus post 0.87 (95 % CI, 0.84, 0.90), p = 0.001; quality assurance—pre 0.72 (95 % CI, 0.67, 0.77) versus post 0.84 (95 % CI, 0.80, 0.88)). There were statistically significant improvements in scores for nurses stigmatising patients (Jamaica reports of not stigmatising—pre-post intervention 33.9 versus 62.4 %, pre-post control 54.7 versus 64.4 %, p = 0.002—and Kenya pre-post intervention 35 versus 51.6 %, pre-post control 34.2 versus 47.8 %, p = 0.006) and for nurses being stigmatised (Kenya reports of no stigmatisation—pre-post intervention 23 versus 37.3 %, pre-post control 15.4 versus 27 %, p = 0.004). Multivariate results for Kenya and Jamaica were non-significant. Twelve hubs were established; 11 were active at follow-up. Hub members (n = 34) reported significant improvements in their capacity to address care gaps. Conclusions: Leadership hubs, comprising nurses and other stakeholders committed to change and provided with capacity building can collectively identify issues and act on strategies that may improve practice and policy. Overall, hubs did not provide the necessary force to improve the uptake of evidence-informed HIV care in their districts. If hubs are to succeed, they must be integrated within district health authorities and become part of formal, legal organisations that can regularise and sustain them.en_US
dc.description.peer-reviewYesen_US
dc.identifier.citationEdwards, N., Kaseje, D., Kahwa, E., Klopper, H. C., Mill, J., Webber, J.,...Harrowing, J. (2016). The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: A quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa. Implementation Science, 11, 110. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0478-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10133/5390
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.publisher.facultyHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Ottawaen_US
dc.publisher.institutionGreat Lakes University of Kisumuen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of West Indiesen_US
dc.publisher.institutionStellenbosch Universityen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Albertaen_US
dc.publisher.institutionSt. Francis Xavier Universityen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Lethbridgeen_US
dc.publisher.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0478-3
dc.subjectNursesen_US
dc.subjectLeadershipen_US
dc.subjectParticipatory action researchen_US
dc.subjectHIVen_US
dc.subjectLow-and-middle-income countriesen_US
dc.subjectCapacity buildingen_US
dc.subjectHealth system strengtheningen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-informed clinical practiceen_US
dc.subjectWorkplace policiesen_US
dc.subjectQuality assuranceen_US
dc.subjectStigmaen_US
dc.subject.lcshHIV infections--Nursing--Jamaica
dc.subject.lcshHIV infections--Nursing--Kenya
dc.subject.lcshHIV infections--Nursing--Uganda
dc.subject.lcshHIV infections--Nursing--South Africa
dc.titleThe impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Harrowing-impact-of.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections