Testing the animate monitoring hypothesis / Mitchell LaPointe

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLaPointe, Mitchell
dc.contributor.authorUniversity of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science
dc.contributor.supervisorVokey, John R.
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-10T19:43:55Z
dc.date.available2012-05-10T19:43:55Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.degree.levelMasters
dc.descriptionxii, 108 leaves ; 29 cmen_US
dc.description.abstractThe detection of human and non-human animals and their unique (and potentially dangerous) “animation” would have been important to our ancestors’ survival. It would seem plausible that our ancestors would have required a vigilance above and beyond that dedicated to other, inanimate, objects. Considering the millions of years of expending extra energy to monitor these objects, it would also seem likely, at least as advocated by New, Cosmides, and Tooby (2007), that the human visual system would have developed mechanisms to allocate attention automatically and quickly to these objects. We tested the New et al. (2007) “animate monitoring” hypothesis by presenting viewers with a group of animate objects and a group of inanimate objects using the flicker task—a task that is assumed to be one that measures automatic visual attention. These objects were presented on a variety of backgrounds of natural scenes, including some backgrounds that were contextually inconsistent with the target objects. These objects were also presented in either a consistent location within each scene or a location that violated that consistency. Only people objects were consistently more readily detected, not animated objects in general. Detection in this task was affected by more than just the information provided by the target object. Both results provide a serious challenge to the “animate monitoring” hypothesis. Furthermore, the results were shown not to be due to peculiarities of our stimulus set, or by how interesting the members of each object category were. iven_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10133/3054
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of Psychology, c2010en_US
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Psychologyen_US
dc.publisher.facultyArts and Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThesis (University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science)en_US
dc.subjectVisual perceptionen_US
dc.subjectAttentionen_US
dc.subjectDissertations, Academicen_US
dc.titleTesting the animate monitoring hypothesis / Mitchell LaPointeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LAPOINTE_MITCHELL_MSC_2010.pdf
Size:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Arts and Science, Faculty of
University of Lethbridge Theses