Angels, stones, hunters: murder, celebrity and direct cinema
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, Aaron | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-31T17:16:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-31T17:16:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.description | Sherpa Romeo green journal. This is a pre-copyedited version of an article accepted for publication in Studies in Documentary Film following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available through Taylor & Francis. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Direct cinema’s attempt to withhold itself from the world is ethically problematic. The helplessness of documentary subjects and audiences is underscored by this observational style. In Gimme Shelter – a concert film by Albert and David Maysles and Charlotte Zwerin about the Rolling Stones and the fatal violence at the Altamont Speedway Free Festival – social actors are forced to submit to a representational frame they cannot ‘see’, let alone access. Moreover, the audience’s own distance from the pro-filmic events is doubly assured: the film maker’s policy of non-interference precludes and/or renders moot a viewer’s impossible desire to intercede on the subjects’ behalf. | en_US |
dc.description.peer-review | Yes | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Taylor, A. (2011). Angels, stones, hunters: Murder, celebrity and direct cinema. Studies in Documentary Film, 5(1), 45-60. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10133/5112 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.publisher.department | New Media Department | en_US |
dc.publisher.faculty | Arts and Science | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Lethbridge | en_US |
dc.subject | Direct cinema | en_US |
dc.subject | Ethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Documentary | en_US |
dc.subject | Murder | en_US |
dc.subject | Celebrity | en_US |
dc.subject | Power | en_US |
dc.title | Angels, stones, hunters: murder, celebrity and direct cinema | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |