Quantifying lidar elevation accuracy: parameterization and wavelength selection for optimal ground classifications based on time since fire/disturbance
| dc.contributor.author | Nelson, Kailyn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chasmer, Laura | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hopkinson, Christopher | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-21T20:28:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-21T20:28:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description | Open access article. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) applies | |
| dc.description.abstract | Pre- and post-fire airborne lidar data provide an opportunity to determine peat combustion/loss across broad spatial extents. However, lidar measurements of ground surface elevation are prone to uncertainties. Errors may be introduced in several ways, particularly associated with the timing of data collection and the classification of ground points. Ground elevation data must be accurate and precise when estimating relatively small elevation changes due to combustion and subsequent carbon losses. This study identifies the impact of post-fire vegetation regeneration on ground classification parameterizations for optimal accuracy using TerraScan and LAStools with airborne lidar data collected in three wavelengths: 532 nm, 1064 nm, and 1550 nm in low relief boreal peatland environments. While the focus of the study is on elevation accuracy and losses from fire, the research is also highly pertinent to hydrological modelling, forestry, geomorphological change, etc. The study area includes burned and unburned boreal peatlands south of Fort McMurray, Alberta. Lidar and field validation data were collected in July 2018, following the 2016 Horse River Wildfire. An iterative ground classification analysis was conducted whereby validation points were compared with lidar ground-classified data in five environments: road, unburned, burned with shorter vegetative regeneration (SR), burned with taller vegetative regeneration (TR), and cumulative burned (both SR and TR areas) in each of the three laser emission wavelengths individually, as well as combinations of 1550 nm and 1064 nm and 1550 nm, 1064 nm, and 532 nm. We find an optimal average elevational offset of ~0.00 m in SR areas with a range (RMSE) of ~0.09 m using 532 nm data. Average accuracy remains the same in cumulative burned and TR areas, but RMSE increased to ~0.13 m and ~0.16 m, respectively, using 1550 nm and 1064 nm combined data. Finally, data averages ~0.01 m above the field-measured ground surface in unburned boreal peatland and transition areas (RMSE of ~0.19 m) using all wavelengths combined. We conclude that the ‘best’ offset for depth of burn within boreal peatlands is expected to be ~0.01 m, with single point measurement uncertainties upwards of ~0.25 m (RMSE) in areas of tall, dense vegetation regeneration. The importance of classification parameterization identified in this study also highlights the need for more intelligent adaptative classification routines, which can be used in other environments. | |
| dc.description.peer-review | Yes | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Nelson, K., Chasmer, L., & Hopkinson, C. (2022). Quantifying lidar elevation accuracy: parameterization and wavelength selection for optimal ground classifications based on time since fire/disturbance. Remote Sensing, 14(20), Article 5080. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205080 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10133/6879 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Geography and Environment | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Arts and Science | |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Lethbridge | |
| dc.publisher.url | https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205080 | |
| dc.subject | Elevation | |
| dc.subject | Airborne laser scanning | |
| dc.subject | Peatland | |
| dc.subject | Carbon | |
| dc.subject | Accuracy | |
| dc.subject | Change detection | |
| dc.subject | Disturbance | |
| dc.subject | Boreal peatlands | |
| dc.subject | Lidar | |
| dc.subject | Elevation accuracy | |
| dc.subject | Ground classification | |
| dc.subject | Vegetation regeneration | |
| dc.subject | Post-fire | |
| dc.title | Quantifying lidar elevation accuracy: parameterization and wavelength selection for optimal ground classifications based on time since fire/disturbance | |
| dc.type | Article |