Critical realist philosophy for science
dc.contributor.author | Jones, Scott R. | |
dc.contributor.author | University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science | |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Peacock, Kent | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-05-12T19:23:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-05-12T19:23:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
dc.degree.level | Masters | |
dc.description | i, 95 leaves ; 28 cm. | en |
dc.description.abstract | This paper considers the philosophy of science that is central to Critical Realism (CR). Following a discussion of the foundational transcendental arguments of the movement, it reviews stratification, emergence, and the possibility of a unity between the natural and the social sciences. CR is broadly contrasted with other versions of scientific realism, empiricism, and idealism. the philosophy of psychology is considered as a test case in which critical realism can be demonstrated to be a workable theory of science. Specifically, a theory is propsed of social psychology that would be scientific in virtue of meeting the standards of a critical realist view of science. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10133/184 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Faculty of Arts and Science, 2002 | en |
dc.publisher.department | Department of Philosophy | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Arts and Science | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Thesis (University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science) | en |
dc.subject | Critical realism | en |
dc.subject | Realism | en |
dc.subject | Philosophy, Modern | en |
dc.subject | Philosophy and science | en |
dc.subject | Dissertations, Academic | en |
dc.title | Critical realist philosophy for science | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |