Untying the knot: feminist expert evidence in the "remarkable" Polygamy Reference decision

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Brittney
dc.contributor.authorUniversity of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science
dc.contributor.supervisorFiske, Jo-Anne
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-13T19:54:47Z
dc.date.available2017-03-13T19:54:47Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.degree.levelMastersen_US
dc.description.abstractFollowing the arrests of Winston Blackmore and James Oler of Bountiful, British Columbia in 2009 polygamy has captured the attention of media, the legal system, and the general population of Canada. Overwhelmingly, the central discourse surrounding polygamy in the media has tended to be one of secrecy, forbidden religious practices, and oppression; this discourse of polygamy as harmful was substantiated by Chief Justice Bauman in the Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada, referred to in this thesis as the Polygamy Reference. Conversely, feminist research on the topic of polygamy in Canada, conducted through myriad methodologies, challenges the claim that polygamy is inherently harmful. This thesis seeks to analyze the ways in which polygamy is addressed in the Polygamy Reference and the treatment of feminist qualitative research opposing criminalization of polygamy in the decision. The study examines the research question: In what ways does the Polygamy Reference integrate or dismiss qualitative feminist research in sustaining its central claim that polygamy is inherently harmful? Secondary research questions included: If this feminist research was not integrated in the Polygamy Reference, whose research was favored? What discourses and methods does Chief Justice Bauman draw upon to sustain the claim that polygamy is inherently harmful? By utilizing a feminist post-structural lens, and applying a critical discourse analysis and thematic coding to the Reference, this thesis argues that the Polygamy Reference marginalizes particular feminist research as one way to sustain its claim that polygamy is inherently harmful.en_US
dc.embargoNoen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10133/4794
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.proquest.subject0453en_US
dc.proquestyesYesen_US
dc.publisherLethbridge, Alta : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of Women and Gender Studiesen_US
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Women and Gender Studiesen_US
dc.publisher.facultyArts and Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThesis (University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science)en_US
dc.subjectcriminalization of polygamyen_US
dc.subjectfeminismen_US
dc.subjectfeminist qualitative researchen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subjectpolygamyen_US
dc.subjectPolygamy Referenceen_US
dc.titleUntying the knot: feminist expert evidence in the "remarkable" Polygamy Reference decisionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ADAMS_BRITTNEY_MA_2016.pdf
Size:
669.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.19 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Arts and Science, Faculty of
University of Lethbridge Theses