Defining the scholarly commons - reimagining research communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKramer, Bianca
dc.contributor.authorBosman, Jeroen
dc.contributor.authorIgnac, Marcin
dc.contributor.authorKral, Christina
dc.contributor.authorKalleinen, Tellervo
dc.contributor.authorKoskinen, Pekko
dc.contributor.authorBruno, Ian
dc.contributor.authorBuckland, Amy
dc.contributor.authorCallaghan, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorChampieux, Robin
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Chris
dc.contributor.authorHagstrom, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorMartone, MaryAnn
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Daniel Paul
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-20T21:35:00Z
dc.date.available2019-08-20T21:35:00Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionOpen access article. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) applies.en_US
dc.description.abstract'Today’s dominant modes and models of scholarly communication stem from 350 years of tradition around scholarly and scientific dissemination through printed materials. As has been often noted, current forms of electronic communications recapitulate these practices and perpetuate the reward systems built around them. Too often, scholars are unaware of the origins of current practices and accept the status quo because "that’s how it's done". But what if we could start over? What if we had computers, an internet, search engines and social media, but no legacy of journals, articles, books, review systems etc.? How would we be acting as scholars to communicate our research and put it to maximum use? What would consumers of this scholarship expect? To what extent is the promise of new modes of communication enabled by 21st century technology fostered or held back by these traditions?en_US
dc.description.peer-reviewYesen_US
dc.identifier.citationKramer, B., Bosman, J., Ignac, M., Kral, C., Kalleinen, T., Koskinen, P., ...0'Donnell, D. P. (2016). Defining the scholarly commons - Reimagining research communications. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 2, e9340. doi: 10.3897/rio.2.e9340en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10133/5500
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPensoft Publishersen_US
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Englishen_US
dc.publisher.facultyArts and Scienceen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUtrecht Universityen_US
dc.publisher.institutionVariable.io (U. K)en_US
dc.publisher.institutionYKON (Berlin)en_US
dc.publisher.institutionYKON (Helsinki)en_US
dc.publisher.institutionCambridge Crystallographic Data Centreen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Chicagoen_US
dc.publisher.institutionScience and Technology Facilities Council (U.K.)en_US
dc.publisher.institutionOregon Health and Science Universityen_US
dc.publisher.institutionPentandra (U.S.)en_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Californiaen_US
dc.publisher.institutionHypothes.is (U.S.)en_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Readingen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Lethbridgeen_US
dc.publisher.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
dc.subjectScholarly communicationen_US
dc.subjectResearch communicationen_US
dc.subjectScholarly commonsen_US
dc.subjectWorkshopen_US
dc.subjectVisualizationen_US
dc.subjectPrinciplesen_US
dc.subject.lcshCommunication in learning and scholarship
dc.titleDefining the scholarly commons - reimagining research communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
O'Donnell-defining-the-scholarly.pdf
Size:
2.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
O'Donnell, Dan