McCune, Jenny L.
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing McCune, Jenny L. by Subject "Endangered species--Canada"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemAre we accurately estimating the potential role of pollution in the decline of species at risk in Canada?(Canadian Science Publishing, 2019) McCune, Jenny L.; Colla, Sheila R.; Coristine, Laura E.; Davy, Christina M.; Flockhart, D. T. Tyler; Schuster, Richard; Orihel, Diane M.Pollution is a pervasive, albeit often invisible, threat to biodiversity in Canada. Currently, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) relies on expert opinion to assess the scope (i.e., the proportion of a species’ population that may be affected) of pollution to species at risk. Here, we describe a spatially explicit, quantitative method for assessing the scope of pollution as a threat to species at risk in Canada. Using this method, we quantified the geographic co-occurrence of 488 terrestrial and freshwater species and pollution sources and determined that, on average, 57% of the mapped occurrences of each species at risk co-occurred with at least one pollution source. Furthermore, we found a weak correlation between the scope of the threat of pollution as assessed by COSEWIC expert panels and the geographic overlap of species occurrences and pollution sources that we determined with our quantitative method. Experts frequently identified scope of pollution as absent or negligible even for species with extensive co-occurrence with pollution sources, especially vascular plants. Clearly, a quantitative approach is needed to make accurate estimates of the scope of pollution as a threat to species at risk in Canada.
- ItemAssessing public comitment to endangered species protection: a Canadian case study(Canadian Science Publishing, 2017) McCune, Jenny L.; Carlsson, Anja M.; Colla, Sheila; Davy, Christina; Favaro, Brett; Ford, Adam T.; Fraser, Kevin C.; Martins, Eduardo G.Preventing the extinction of species will require limiting human activities in key areas, but it is unclear to what extent the public is committed to these limits and the associated costs. We commissioned an online survey of 1000 Canadians and asked them if it is important to prevent the extinction of wild species in Canada. We used specific scenarios illustrating the need for limits to personal activities, private property rights, and industrial development to further test their support. The respondents were strongly committed to species conservation in principle (89% agree), including the need to limit industrial development (80% agree). There was less support for limiting private property rights (63% agree), and more uncertainty when scenarios suggested potential loss of property rights and industry-based jobs. This highlights the high level of public concern regarding the economic impacts of preventing extinctions, and the need for more programs to encourage voluntary stewardship of endangered species on private land. Opinion polls that measure public support for conservation without acknowledging the concessions required may result in overly optimistic estimates of the level of support. Most Canadians in our sample supported endangered species conservation even when the necessity of limiting human activities was explicitly stated.