Pellis, Sergio

Permanent URI for this collection

https://opus.uleth.ca/handle/10133/5256

Browse

Browsing Pellis, Sergio by Author "Ham, Jackson R."

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Groups of familiar male rats form unstable partner preferences when play fighting during the juvenile period
    (Cell Press, 2025) Ham, Jackson R.; Pellis, Sergio
    Rats are social animals living in large groups. Within these groups, juveniles engage in vigorous rough-and-tumble play. Despite their natural ecology, most current studies of their play behavior involve pairs not groups. To investigate play under more naturalistic settings, we examined the play of eight groups of juvenile male rats, with each group comprising six, same-aged peers that lived together. Each group was tested on multiple days over the peak play period (30–40 postnatal days). On any given day, rats showed partner preferences for certain individuals in the group, however, preferences varied from day to day. Despite changes in partner preferences, rats chose to play with partners that engaged in more turn taking and with partners with whom they had more symmetrical play relationships. That some individuals within the group were consistently preferred as play partners while others were consistently avoided may have developmental consequences, with those who are favored gaining greater benefits from their juvenile play experiences.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Juvenile male rats form preferences based on strain when playing in groups but not in pairs
    (Frontiers Media, 2025) Ham, Jackson R.; Jaiswal, Diya; Waner-Mariquito, Renata; Pellis, Sergio; Achterberg, E. J. Marijke
    Like many young mammals, juvenile rats engage in rough-and-tumble play. Play occurs naturally both in wild and laboratory rats, making it a suitable, ethologically relevant behavior to investigate. In the laboratory, rats are typically housed and tested in dyads, despite living in large colonies in the wild. Consequently, when tested in the lab, rats do not have a choice of partners and are instead paired with whomever the researcher selects. Given that both the amount and style of play rats engage in varies considerably depending on the strain of rat being studied, we tested whether rats select play partners based on strain. To do so, juvenile male Long Evans (LE) focal rats (n = 8) were subjected to three play contexts: (1) group play; (2) dyadic play; and (3) social conditioned place preference. During group play, the LE subject rats were given the choice to play with an LE, a Sprague Dawley (SD), or Fischer 344 rat (F344), simultaneously. During dyadic play, focal rats played one-on-one with an LE, SD, or F344 partner. Finally, the rats were conditioned to a context and a social stimulus, with the context either being paired with an LE (preferred stimulus) or F344 (unpreferred stimulus) partner. We found that, when given a choice in a group setting, LE focal rats prefer to play with same-strain partners over both SD and F344 partners. However, when playing under dyadic conditions (i.e., with an assigned partner), LE rats played with each strain equally. Finally, in the socially conditioned place preference test, we found that the focal rats formed preferences for a particular enclosure, but not for the strain. Together, these results suggest that when given a choice, LE rats prefer to play with their own strain, but when they do not have a choice, any strain will do. Given that the testing paradigm can greatly influence the results obtained and the conclusions drawn, our findings highlight the need to consider the research question(s) being asked when determining the most appropriate paradigms to employ.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Oppositions, joints, and targets: the attractors that are the glue of social interactions
    (Frontiers Media, 2024) Ham, Jackson R.; Pellis, Sergio; Pellis, Vivien
    Social interactions are often analyzed by scoring segments of predefined behavior and then statistically assessing numerical and sequential patterns to identify the structure of the encounters. However, this approach can miss the dynamics of the animals’ relationship over the course of the encounter, one that often involves invariant bonds, say a nose-to-nose orientation, with many different movements performed by both partners acting to counteract each other’s attempts to break or maintain the relationship. Moreover, these invariant bonds can switch from one configuration to another during an interaction, leading from one stable configuration to another. It is this stepwise sequence of configurational stabilities that lead to functional outcomes, such as mating, aggression, or predation. By focusing on the sequence of invariant relational configurations, the deep structure of interactions can be discerned. This deep structure can then be used to differentiate between compensatory movements, no matter how seemingly stereotyped they may appear, from movement patterns which are restricted to a particular form when more than one option is available. A dynamic perspective requires suitable tools for analysis, and such tools are highlighted as needed in describing particular interactions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Play fighting revisited: its design features and how they shape our understanding of its mechanism and functions
    (Frontiers Media, 2024) Pellis, Sergio M.; Pellis, Vivien C.; Ham, Jackson R.
    Play fighting has been one of the most intensely studied forms of play and so has provided some of our deepest insights into the understanding of play in general. As the label implies, this behavior resembles serious fighting, in that the animals compete for an advantage over one another, but unlike true aggression, for play fighting to remain playful, it also incorporates a degree of cooperation and reciprocity – restrained competition seems to be its hallmark. Despite these common features, it should be noted that both the advantage competed over and the mechanisms by which restraint is achieved varies across species. Such variation mitigates simple generalities. For example, how empirical support for a proposed adaptive function in one species not being replicated in another, is to be interpreted. What has emerged over the past few decades is that play fighting is diverse, varying across several dimensions, some superficial, some fundamental, making choosing species to compare a challenge. In this paper,we explore various design features that constitute play fighting and the ways these can be modified across different species and lineages of species. Given that a major pillar of ethology is that description precedes explanation, having a good grasp of the behavioral diversity of play fighting is an essential starting point for detailed analyses of the mechanisms and functions of play. We show that commonalities across species likely involve different mechanisms than do species idiosyncrasies, and that different styles of play fighting likely afford different adaptive opportunities
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Play partner preferences among groups of unfamiliar juvenile male rats
    (Nature, 2024) Ham, Jackson R.; Pellis, Sergio
    Like many mammals, as juveniles, rats engage in play fighting, which in the laboratory is typically studied in dyads, and consequently, it is the researcher who determines a rat’s play partner. In real-life conditions, a rat would have many partners with whom to play. In a previous study, we found that rats do prefer to play with some individuals more than others, and surprisingly, when given the choice, unfamiliar partners are preferred to familiar ones. In this study, we assessed partner choice when all the available partners are strangers. Eight groups of six unfamiliar juvenile male rats were observed for 10 min play trials. One of the six in each group was selected as the ‘focal’ rat and his play towards, and received by, the others were scored. Social networks revealed that five of the eight groups formed preferences, with preferred partners also engaging in more play with the focal rat. The mechanism by which these preferences were formed remains to be determined, but it seems that there are individual differences, potentially in the amount and style of play, that allow an individual to select the most suitable partner from a group of strangers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Playful mouth-to-mouth interactions of belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) in managed care
    (Wiley, 2023) Ham, Jackson R.; Lilley, Malin K.; Wincheski, Riley J.; Miranda, Jesus; Velarde Dediós, Angel G.; Kolodziej, Katie; Pellis, Sergio; Manitzas Hill, Heather M.
    Belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) engage in many forms of play (e.g., object, water, locomotor), but no play is quite as curious as the unusual form of cooperative social play involving mouth-to-mouth interactions. These playful interactions are characterized by two belugas approaching each other head-to-head and interlocking their jaws, clasping one another, as if they were shaking hands. Observed in belugas both in the wild and in managed care, it is seemingly an important type of social play that offers a unique way of socializing with conspecifics. To describe this unusual behavior, a group of belugas in managed care was observed from 2007 to 2019. Although adults participated in mouth-to-mouth interactions, most were initiated and received by young belugas. Both males and females engaged in mouth-to-mouth interactions and did so at similar frequencies. Individual differences in how many mouth-to-mouth interactions were initiated among calves were also observed. Due to the unique, cooperative nature of mouth-to-mouth interactions, which require both social and motor skills, it is hypothesized that these interactions may be used to test social and motor competency.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Quality not quantity: deficient juvenile play experiences lead to altered medial prefrontal cortex neurons and sociocognitive skill deficits
    (Wiley, 2024) Ham, Jackson R.; Szabo, Madeline; Annor-Bediako, Jessica; Stark, Rachel A.; Iwaniuk, Andrew N.; Pellis, Sergio M.
    Reduced play experience over the juvenile period leads to adults with impoverished social skills and to anatomical and physiological aberrations of the neurons found in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Even rearing rats from high-playing strains with low-playing strains show these developmental consequences. In the present study, we evaluated whether low-playing rats benefit from being reared with higher playing peers. To test this, we reared male Fischer 344 rats (F344), typically thought to be a low-playing strain, with a Long–Evans (LE) peer, a relatively high-playing strain. As juveniles, F344 rats reared with LE rats experienced less play and lower quality play compared to those reared with another F344. As adults, the F344 rats reared with LE partners exhibited poorer social skills and the pyramidal neurons of their mPFC had larger dendritic arbors than F344 rats reared with same-strain peers. These findings show that being reared with a more playful partner does not improve developmental outcomes of F344 rats, rather the discordance in the play styles of F344 and LE rats leads to poorer outcomes.