Ethical considerations and writing assessment
| dc.contributor.author | Slomp, David H. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-27T19:41:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-27T19:41:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description | Open access article. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) applies | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | In this introductory article, I set the stage for the arguments that follow in each of the contributions to this special issue. First, I critically examine the three pillars of the current Standards--fairness, validity, and reliability--exploring briefly how on their own each concept is insufficient to guiding ethical practice. Then I briefly examine the Standards themselves highlighting their limitations in guiding ethical practice. Finally, I provide a brief introduction to the various dimensions of the theory of ethics we are developing in this special issue. | en_US |
| dc.description.peer-review | Yes | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Slomp, D. (2016). Ethical considerations and writing assessment. Journal of Writing Assessment, 9(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2k14r1zg | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10133/6287 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of California, Davis | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Education | en_US |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Lethbridge | en_US |
| dc.publisher.url | https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2k14r1zg | en_US |
| dc.subject | Writing assessment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Writing ability | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ethical practice | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ethical considerations | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Composition (Language arts)--Ability testing | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Composition (Language arts)--Study and teaching | |
| dc.title | Ethical considerations and writing assessment | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |