Justice-oriented, antiracist validation: continuing to disrupt white supremacy in assessment practices
dc.contributor.author | Randall, Jennifer | |
dc.contributor.author | Poe, Mya | |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveri, Maria Elena | |
dc.contributor.author | Slomp, David | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-01T23:47:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-01T23:47:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.description | Open access article. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED) applies | |
dc.description.abstract | Traditional validation approaches fail to account for the ways oppressive systems (e.g. racism, radical nationalism) impact the test design and development process. To disrupt this legacy of white supremacy, we illustrate how justice-oriented, antiracist validation (JAV) framework can be applied to construct articulation and validation, data analysis, and score reporting/interpretation phases of assessment design/development. In this article, we use the JAV framework to describe validation processes that acknowledge the role and impact of race/racism on our assessment processes—specifically construct articulation, analysis, and score reporting—on Black, Brown, Indigenous, and other students from historically marginalized populations. Through a JAV framework, we seek to disrupt inaccurate white supremacist approaches and interpretations that for too long have fuelled measurement practices. | |
dc.description.peer-review | Yes | |
dc.identifier.citation | Randall, J., Poe, M., Oliveri, M. E., & Slomp, D. (2023). Justice-oriented, antiracist validation: Continuing to disrupt white supremacy in assessment practices. Educational Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2023.2285047 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10133/6703 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Education | |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Michigan | |
dc.publisher.institution | Northeastern University | |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Nebraska | |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Lethbridge | |
dc.publisher.url | https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2023.2285047 | |
dc.subject | Antiracist validity | |
dc.subject | Justice-oriented validity | |
dc.subject | Antiracist assessment | |
dc.subject | White supremacist | |
dc.subject | Assessment design | |
dc.subject | Assessment development | |
dc.subject | Test design | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Anti-racism | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Educational tests and measurements | |
dc.title | Justice-oriented, antiracist validation: continuing to disrupt white supremacy in assessment practices | |
dc.type | Article |