Our validity looks like justice. Does yours?
dc.contributor.author | Randall, Jennifer | |
dc.contributor.author | Poe, Mya | |
dc.contributor.author | Slomp, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveri, Maria E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-02T19:58:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-02T19:58:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.description | Open access article. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC 4.0 DEED) applies | |
dc.description.abstract | Educational assessments, from kindergarden to 12th grade (K-12) to licensure, have a long, well-documented history of oppression and marginalization. In this paper, we (the authors) ask the field of educational assessment/measurement to actively disrupt the White supremacist and racist logics that fuel this marginalization and re-orient itself toward assessment justice. We describe how a justice-oriented, antiracist validity (JAV) approach to validation processes can support assessment justice efforts, specifically with respect to language assessment. Relying on antiracist principles and critical quantitative methodologies, a JAV approach proposes a set of critical questions to consider when gathering validity evidence, with potential utility for language testers. | |
dc.description.peer-review | Yes | |
dc.identifier.citation | Randall, J., Poe, M., Slomp, D., & Oliveri, M. E. (2023). Our validity looks like justice. Does yours? Language Testing, 41(1), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231202947 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10133/6704 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Sage | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Education | |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Michigan | |
dc.publisher.institution | Northeastern University | |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Lethbridge | |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Nebraska | |
dc.publisher.url | https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231202947 | |
dc.subject | Antiracist validity | |
dc.subject | Justice-oriented assessment | |
dc.subject | Justice-oriented measurement | |
dc.subject | Justice-oriented validity | |
dc.subject | Language assessment | |
dc.subject | Validity | |
dc.subject | White supremacist | |
dc.subject | Educational assessment | |
dc.subject | Assessment design | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Educational tests and measurements | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Anti-racism | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Language and languages--Ability testing | |
dc.title | Our validity looks like justice. Does yours? | |
dc.type | Article |