Does rhetoric have a place in Wolhrapp's theory of argument?
| dc.contributor.author | Stevens, Katharina | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-13T22:22:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-13T22:22:18Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description | Open access article. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper aims to determine whether rhetoric has a place in Wohlrapp's theory of argumentation. Wohlrapp's own attitude towards rhetoric is ambiguous. There are passages in his book where he grants that rhetoric might have a role to play when it comes to the subjective side of argumentation. Overall, however, he views rhetoric with deep suspicion. I argue that in spite of Wohlrapp's negative attitude, his theory of argumentation would benefit from integrating a theory of rhetoric. I take Wohlrapp's concepts of frame and insight as a starting point to make my case. | en_US |
| dc.description.peer-review | Yes | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Stevens, K. (2017). Does rhetoric have a place in Wohlrapp's theory of argument? Informal Logic, 37(3), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v37i3.4698 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10133/6394 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Windsor | en_US |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Arts and Science | en_US |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Lethbridge | en_US |
| dc.publisher.url | https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v37i3.4698 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Frames | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cognitive environment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rhetoric | en_US |
| dc.subject | Wohlrapp | en_US |
| dc.subject | Argumentation | |
| dc.subject | Theory of argument | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Wohlrapp, Harald--Criticism and interpretation | |
| dc.title | Does rhetoric have a place in Wolhrapp's theory of argument? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |