What about performers do free jazz improvisers agree upon? A case study
| dc.contributor.author | Pras, Amandine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schober, Michael F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Spiro, Neta | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-09T19:06:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-09T19:06:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description | Sherpa Romeo green journal; open access | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | When musicians improvise freely together-not following any sort of script, predetermined harmonic structure, or "referent"-to what extent do they understand what they are doing in the same way as each other? And to what extent is their understanding privileged relative to outside listeners with similar levels of performing experience in free improvisation? In this exploratory case study, a saxophonist and a pianist of international renown who knew each other’s work but who had never performed together before were recorded while improvising freely for 40 min. Immediately afterwards the performers were interviewed separately about the just-completed improvisation, first from memory and then while listening to two 5 min excerpts of the recording in order to prompt specific and detailed commentary. Two commenting listeners from the same performance community (a saxophonist and drummer) listened to, and were interviewed about, these excerpts. Some months later, all four participants rated the extent to which they endorsed 302 statements that had been extracted from the four interviews and anonymized. The findings demonstrate that these free jazz improvisers characterized the improvisation quite differently, selecting different moments to comment about and with little overlap in the content of their characterizations. The performers were not more likely to endorse statements by their performing partner than by a commenting listener from the same performance community, and their patterns of agreement with each other (endorsing or dissenting with statements) across multiple ratings—their interrater reliability as measured with Cohen’s kappa—was only moderate, and not consistently higher than their agreement with the commenting listeners. These performers were more likely to endorse statements about performers’ thoughts and actions than statements about the music itself, and more likely to endorse evaluatively positive than negative statements. But these kinds of statements were polarizing; the performers were more likely to agree with each other in their ratings of statements about the music itself and negative statements. As in Schober and Spiro (2014), the evidence supports a view that fully shared understanding is not needed for joint improvisation by professional musicians in this genre and that performing partners can agree with an outside listener more than with each other. | en_US |
| dc.description.peer-review | Yes | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Pras, A., Schober, M. F., & Spiro, N. (2017). What about performance do free jazz improvisers agree upon? A case study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(966). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00966 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10133/5240 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | en_US |
| dc.publisher.department | Department of Music | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Arts and Science | en_US |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Lethbridge | en_US |
| dc.publisher.institution | Uniiversity of Cambridge | en_US |
| dc.subject | Free jazz | en_US |
| dc.subject | Improvisation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Shared understanding | en_US |
| dc.subject | Music cognition | en_US |
| dc.subject | Intersubjectivity | en_US |
| dc.subject | Creative process | en_US |
| dc.subject | Collaboration | en_US |
| dc.subject | Interrater agreement | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Improvisation (Music) | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Free jazz--Analysis, appreciation | |
| dc.title | What about performers do free jazz improvisers agree upon? A case study | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |