Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kramer, Bianca
dc.contributor.author Bosman, Jeroen
dc.contributor.author Ignac, Marcin
dc.contributor.author Kral, Christina
dc.contributor.author Kalleinen, Tellervo
dc.contributor.author Koskinen, Pekko
dc.contributor.author Bruno, Ian
dc.contributor.author Buckland, Amy
dc.contributor.author Callaghan, Sarah
dc.contributor.author Champieux, Robin
dc.contributor.author Chapman, Chris
dc.contributor.author Hagstrom, Stephanie
dc.contributor.author Martone, MaryAnn
dc.contributor.author Murphy, Fiona
dc.contributor.author O'Donnell, Daniel Paul
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-20T21:35:00Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-20T21:35:00Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Kramer, B., Bosman, J., Ignac, M., Kral, C., Kalleinen, T., Koskinen, P., ...0'Donnell, D. P. (2016). Defining the scholarly commons - Reimagining research communications. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 2, e9340. doi: 10.3897/rio.2.e9340 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10133/5500
dc.description Sherpa Romeo blue journal. Open access article. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) applies. en_US
dc.description.abstract 'Today’s dominant modes and models of scholarly communication stem from 350 years of tradition around scholarly and scientific dissemination through printed materials. As has been often noted, current forms of electronic communications recapitulate these practices and perpetuate the reward systems built around them. Too often, scholars are unaware of the origins of current practices and accept the status quo because "that’s how it's done". But what if we could start over? What if we had computers, an internet, search engines and social media, but no legacy of journals, articles, books, review systems etc.? How would we be acting as scholars to communicate our research and put it to maximum use? What would consumers of this scholarship expect? To what extent is the promise of new modes of communication enabled by 21st century technology fostered or held back by these traditions? en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Pensoft Publishers en_US
dc.subject Scholarly communication en_US
dc.subject Research communication en_US
dc.subject Scholarly commons en_US
dc.subject Workshop en_US
dc.subject Visualization en_US
dc.subject Principles en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Communication in learning and scholarship
dc.title Defining the scholarly commons - reimagining research communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016. en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.publisher.faculty Arts and Science en_US
dc.publisher.department Department of English en_US
dc.description.peer-review Yes en_US
dc.publisher.institution Utrecht University en_US
dc.publisher.institution Variable.io (U. K) en_US
dc.publisher.institution YKON (Berlin) en_US
dc.publisher.institution YKON (Helsinki) en_US
dc.publisher.institution Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre en_US
dc.publisher.institution University of Chicago en_US
dc.publisher.institution Science and Technology Facilities Council (U.K.) en_US
dc.publisher.institution Oregon Health and Science University en_US
dc.publisher.institution Pentandra (U.S.) en_US
dc.publisher.institution University of California en_US
dc.publisher.institution Hypothes.is (U.S.) en_US
dc.publisher.institution University of Reading en_US
dc.publisher.institution University of Lethbridge en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record